[X]
Write ReviewJump to 
1
Helpful
Votes
Votes
Nike Air Max 2012+ 169.99 Shoe Lasted Me Only 3 Months.
Abnormal Sole Wear. - Complaint
Review by Seansurfn2 on 2012-11-11
Rating: 
TAMPA, FLORIDA -- I saw that I'm not alone with this issue. Nike Air Max shoe I watched it have sole wear extremely quicky and after only 3 months it developed a hole in the air pad. I have owned different shoes which cost only about 55-60 bux which are 2-3 years old and I run on them 3-4 times more and still have plenty of sole. This model I think might be recalled or has serious flaws in the sole rubber.
It also has a very thin rubber sole to begin with and is poorly designed. Their customer service is horrible. First time after 15 years of buying their products I had to spend 27 bucks to ship it just to have it shipped back.. and not even with packing materials.
I'd figure for a 180 dollar shoe you'd have it last more than 3 months. This could be what pushes me to buy Reebok products in the future.
It also has a very thin rubber sole to begin with and is poorly designed. Their customer service is horrible. First time after 15 years of buying their products I had to spend 27 bucks to ship it just to have it shipped back.. and not even with packing materials.
I'd figure for a 180 dollar shoe you'd have it last more than 3 months. This could be what pushes me to buy Reebok products in the future.
Comments:
Posted by trmn8r on 2012-11-11:
Sneakers have gone through the roof pricewise. My running shoes used to be $40-50, and they jumped quickly to over $100.
This is a good warning for others looking to buy the Air Max.
This is a good warning for others looking to buy the Air Max.
Note: All comments are reviewed by a moderator before being published. Please be sure to read our guidelines before commenting.
Company Reps: Post your company response!
