Maryland Attorney General Office Complaint - Liberian Sex Monster - Justice

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

I also read about this case, and dropping the charges is absolutely ridiculous!

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

Oh my god, what another tragedy in our so called judicial system.

My prayers go out to that little, innocent angel.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

That's yankee justice for ya...Send him on down here to Oklahoma or Texas. We tend to execute first... ask questions second...trial is a distant third.. We pretty much figure God will sort it all out in the end.

Hope the prosecutor is able to win the appeal. Ditto Skye.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Unbelievable!!!
Fu** the judicial system!

Posted by Ponie on 2007-07-23:

State attorney McCarthy held a short presser earlier today. Some time this afternoon, he's appealing the ruling handed down by Judge Katherine Savage which lets this monster go free.

Within something like a two hour period yesterday, the Washington Post was able to locate three competent interpreters. Also the alleged (I hate that word) rapist was interviewed by FOX News yesterday and spoke very good English. I noted FOX is not playing the video, just commenting on it.

My Sis lives in Montgomery County MD where all this took place. I sent her an email ribbing her about the kind of justice meted out in her county. I also told her to make note of the judge's name in case it's an elected office. She replied that 'sometimes we get things right' (meaning McCarthy) and will remember Savage's name.

At the presser, McCarthy said he felt 'confident the ruling will be overturned.' I hope so, also.

Posted by Ponie on 2007-07-23:

P.S. Starlord. The attorney general IS getting involved by having McCarthy file an appeal. I pray the appeal is granted.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Our government is out of control and the lawyers and judges are running amuck all over the law and the people of the USA. It is passed time for these people to be held accountable for the crimes they commit against the law’s that they were swarm to up hold.

People such a J. Sutton who spend millions to lock up Americans doing there job to protect America, yet criminals are set free and even paid millions to do WHAT?

What is it these people are hiding by letting rapist go free to rape again? By letting drug dealers go free to bring more drugs in to an already drug saturated country.

Maybe it’s time for the people to take a long hard look at the situation and begin to put a stop to this kind of criminal actions by putting these judges, lawyers and politicians where they belong in prison?

Read the rest of the story below.

By Jonathan Paye-Layleh BBC News, Monrovia

A new bill in Liberia calling for tough penalties for rapists has been submitted to the president.
The Female Lawyers Association want their draft bill to replace current law, which is vague and has allowed rapists to go unpunished.

Under the new proposals, those found guilty of raping someone under 18 years old would be jailed for life.

Rape is on the increase since the end of the 14-year civil war in 2003 which saw widespread sexual violence.

There are currently 80 rape cases documented at the national human rights commission.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4725263.stm

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Nothing surprises me in this state anymore. From now on the State of Maryland will be known as the State of Confusion.

Posted by Nohandle on 2007-07-23:

Does anyone remember the time when a convicted rapist was given the death penalty and that penalty was carried out? The rape of a innocent child was unspeakable and I doubt the individual was even given a trial by the time the family got through with him.

Starlord, on my MSN search I looked up Rape Capital Offense and the following was first on the list. I thought some might be interested in the states taking this seriously. It's a bit lengthy, sorry, but I feel people need to be aware.
May 31, 2007
Analysis of capital child rape laws
At FindLaw, Professor Marci Hamilton has this new commentary discussing new laws making child rape a capital offense. Here is how it begins:

Last week, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the death penalty as applied to a child abuser. Louisiana has led the way in passing laws to execute pedophiles. However, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Georgia, and Montana also have passed such laws, with Texas soon to follow when Gov. Rick Perry signs such legislation.

A major impetus for the death penalty in child sex cases is the heinous crime by a previously-convicted sex offender against Florida nine-year old Jessica Lunsford, who suffered horrific abuse, including burial alive in a shallow grave, where she eventually suffocated. If there is a way to measure the temperature of public opinion against child abuse, this is it, and it bodes well for children, even if it is not the most effective way of protecting children.

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

Thank you No Handle. I am sick of the innocence of children being taken away and some even murdered by the sick trash of society. I think the death penalty is well long overdue for repeat offending pedophiles.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

raping - Does that mean he had sex with her by using forse.

Posted by Noneill on 2007-07-23:

I am outraged as anyone else, but I want to say that the title of your complaint is misleading. He didn't have sex with a 7 y/o. He raped her and that is a crime of violence, not sex.

Posted by tnchuck100 on 2007-07-23:

100 years ago the "law" did not have to concern themselves with a situation such as this. The child's father would kill him! Justice served!

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Noneill - But i thought rape was makeing someone have sex when they did not want to.

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

Ok, this story is on Nancy Grace right now. He went to high school and college here, and speaks English. This whole thing is insane. The judge is a lunatic to throw this case out.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

I wonder what was in it for the judge?

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

She's saying in pained her, but that she had to throw it out, since he didn't get a fair and speedy trial. Thing is, he signed off on something waiving this right. She basically gave up and was sick of dealing with all this. What!!

Also, he speaks English. What about this little girls rights?? The whole thing makes me want to pull the switch on the electric chair myself, to have him eliminated.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

This system,or SHI*STEM is corrupt!!!!
Im moving to Canada!

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

It's not the system Steve, its the people running it!

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

Does anyone know where her parents were or are?? So far no mention of them.

They are now discussing what disgusting things he did to her when she was six. Full blown sex, as well as penetration in other places. I want to vomit. She's a baby. She is my nieces age :(

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

I think its both.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Thats sick,a grown man with a kid.LET ME AT HIM!!

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

How To Destroy America
by Richard D. Lamm
March 22, 2006

"First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

http://www.afr.org/editorials/lamm/032206.html

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Lidman,where do you get this stuff?
Racists-R-us?
LOL

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

I would love to let you guys loose on him. See how tough he is then. If it was only in my power.

Posted by Nohandle on 2007-07-23:

About a year or two ago, in this area, we had a situation where a man was arrested for sexual child abuse. A done deal at the time of his arrest due to the evidence. He was tossed into the "community lock up" if that's the correct term and although not killed, he was pretty well taken care of that night by the others who were in the cell and had learned what he was in there for. He recovered sufficiently to stand trial and sentenced to prison. I certainly hope the word was passed on. Never heard anything since. Perhaps we best put the criminals in charge of child abuse cases. I understand they don't take too kindly to them.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

I was kidding Lid.
Dont yell at me.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Guys in jail take care of the justice these creeps deserve.
If the judge,and jury wont dirty their hands,No worries send him to prison.

Posted by Skye on 2007-07-23:

No handle, that's the best suggestion I've read. Really, that's justice being served.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

It's just one of those things I would exspect from a Californian. LOL J/K or am I?

"The American Dream is alive and well
to all those who choose to chase after it."


-Jim Bickford


http://todaysamericandream.com/

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Nohandle, the word does get passed on. That’s the reason the other judge let the pervert go in a different case because he was "short" and they new he wouldn't last a day in prison.

Posted by Starlord on 2007-07-23:

ponie, thank you for the info. I have found out it was the judge in the case who threw the charges out on the word of a psychiatrist (I never met a psychiatrist who w2asn't crazier than his patients.) I fail to understand why they keep saying he cannot be re-charged. He was not found not guilty by a jury, as I understand it, he never saw a jury. Maryland, State of Confusion joins the People's Republic of Massachusetts. Is this some sort of mental defect that is invading all of New England?

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Book I, Chapter 4
Concerning The Tower Of Babylon, And The Confusion Of Tongues
1. Now the sons of Noah were three, -- Shem, Japhet, and Ham, born one hundred years before the Deluge. These first of all descended from the mountains into the plains, and fixed their habitation there; and persuaded others who were greatly afraid of the lower grounds on account of the flood, and so were very loath to come down from the higher places, to venture to follow their examples. Now the plain in which they first dwelt was called Shinar. God also commanded them to send colonies abroad, for the thorough peopling of the earth, that they might not raise seditions among themselves, but might cultivate a great part of the earth, and enjoy its fruits after a plentiful manner. But they were so ill instructed that they did not obey God; for which reason they fell into calamities, and were made sensible, by experience, of what sin they had been guilty: for when they flourished with a numerous youth, God admonished them again to send out colonies; but they, imagining the prosperity they enjoyed was not derived from the favor of God, but supposing that their own power was the proper cause of the plentiful condition they were in, did not obey him. Nay, they added to this their disobedience to the Divine will, the suspicion that they were therefore ordered to send out separate colonies, that, being divided asunder, they might the more easily be Oppressed.
2. Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach! and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers !
3. Now the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to esteem it a piece of cowardice to submit to God; and they built a tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very high, sooner than any one could expect; but the thickness of it was so great, and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, upon the view, to be less than it really was. It was built of burnt brick, cemented together with mortar, made of bitumen, that it might not be liable to admit water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former sinners; but he caused a tumult among them, by producing in them divers languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages, they should not be able to understand one another. The place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the Hebrews mean by the word Babel, confusion. The Sibyl also makes mention of this tower, and of the confusion of the language, when she says thus: "When all men were of one language, some of them built a high tower, as if they would thereby ascend up to heaven, but the gods sent storms of wind and overthrew the tower, and gave every one his peculiar language; and for this reason it was that the city was called Babylon." But as to the plan of Shinar, in the country of Babylonia, Hestiaeus mentions it, when he says thus: "Such of the priests as were saved, took the sacred vessels of Jupiter Enyalius, and came to Shinar of Babylonia."

tp://www.interhack.net/projects/library/antiquities-jews/b1c4.html

Posted by Ponie on 2007-07-23:

starlord, it's that 'double jeopardy' thing. He was charged, charges dismissed by a dim-wit judge, so can't be recharged. They maybe could get him on something else--like spitting on the sidewalk--but not for the same crime again. (Guess I watch too much Law & Order.) Also, I misspoke earlier. FOX didn't have a video interview--they did it by telephone. They said he spoke broken English. But, again, none of the telephone conversation was aired. I wonder why? O'Reilly and Greta VanSusteren had a go at it on the O'Reilly Factor tonight. Naturally, since he's been on the tails of numerous judges who do such stupid things, Bill was blaming the judge. Greta, a former prosecutor, said it was up to the prosecution to obtain a suitable interpreter. I guess they originally had two or three lined up, bur for various reasons none of them served in that capacity.

I still want to see the jerk fry. He looks like a reject from the bottom of the barrel.

Posted by Anonymous on 2007-07-23:

Ponie, good point. Charges dismissed, at this point, because he didn't get a 'speedy trial'.

We can only wish they could get him on something(significant) at this point. What were his words in the phone interview? Something like "I said what I needed to say".

Disgusting.

Posted by runaway on 2007-07-24:

The problem with this case (and I'm sure others like it we don't hear about) comes down to the defendent saying they don't understand English well enough to comprehend the charges and the law and assist in their own defense. Anyone with English as a second language can claim this. If you can't quickly find an "approved" interpreter, then they have the "not given their right to a speedy trial" defense.
Why not have an "approval sytem" for ability to comprehend the language? Tape ALL conversations with the suspect, making sure you ask unrelated questions that test their ability to reason in English (not informing them of what you're doing, of course so they can't fake it), then use those tapes to prove the suspect's comprehension abilities.

Posted by Ponie on 2007-07-24:

Whoooeee! FNC received a 300 page document which shows this low-life's history. He was charged with raping his 7 yr. old niece. It's come to light he also raped another ONE AND A HALF YEAR old niece! Please, Lord, let me at this monster. Within 15 minutes he'd be a soprano--and I don't mean the HBO series. Oh, also, he lives with his father who is a registered sex offender. There are two young girls in the household also. Can't CPS go in and get those kids out of there?